Meaning
We don’t have a verified meaning for Mafalda.
We only publish meanings we can cite to a source you could check yourself. Most sites will give you one anyway; the ones you find elsewhere are often copied between sites without verification.
Its story
Popularity since 1902
Hover over or drag across the chart to see any year.
See the 31 recorded years as a table
| Year | Per million |
|---|---|
| 1902 | 19 |
| 1908 | 15 |
| 1909 | 23 |
| 1910 | 18 |
| 1911 | 31 |
| 1912 | 41 |
| 1913 | 58 |
| 1914 | 56 |
| 1915 | 77 |
| 1916 | 52 |
| 1917 | 70 |
| 1918 | 53 |
| 1919 | 49 |
| 1920 | 46 |
| 1921 | 58 |
| 1922 | 55 |
| 1923 | 67 |
| 1924 | 57 |
| 1925 | 70 |
| 1926 | 58 |
| 1927 | 61 |
| 1928 | 55 |
| 1929 | 35 |
| 1930 | 28 |
| 1931 | 28 |
| 1932 | 15 |
| 1933 | 15 |
| 1934 | 12 |
| 1935 | 10 |
| 1936 | 12 |
| 1937 | 13 |
Where it’s loved
Most popular in these states
Mafalda isn’t concentrated in any one state. Either it’s spread evenly, or no state reaches the 25 births over three years needed before a rate means anything.
More like it
More like Mafalda
Mafalda doesn’t share a sound pattern with any other girls name in this corpus — about 1 name in 100 doesn’t. There’s nothing to compare it to yet.
The numbers
Every figure
- Births in 1937
- 14
- Rank in 1937
- #2,196
- How rare
- 1 in 76,002 girls
- Since 1902
- 1,279
Mafalda was last recorded in 1937. Fewer than five girls have been given the name in any year since, which is the point below which the record stops reporting.
Most popular in 1915, at 77 per million girls born.
There isn’t enough data for a ten-year trend: Mafalda doesn’t appear in both ends of that window.
Figures from the US Social Security Administration’s 2025 release. How these numbers are made.