Meaning
We don’t have a verified meaning for Samul.
We only publish meanings we can cite to a source you could check yourself. Most sites will give you one anyway; the ones you find elsewhere are often copied between sites without verification.
Its story
Popularity since 1882
Hover over or drag across the chart to see any year.
See the 31 recorded years as a table
| Year | Per million |
|---|---|
| 1882 | 44 |
| 1915 | 6 |
| 1917 | 6 |
| 1918 | 8 |
| 1920 | 8 |
| 1921 | 9 |
| 1922 | 8 |
| 1923 | 10 |
| 1924 | 9 |
| 1925 | 12 |
| 1926 | 12 |
| 1927 | 4 |
| 1928 | 7 |
| 1929 | 7 |
| 1930 | 8 |
| 1932 | 8 |
| 1933 | 5 |
| 1934 | 8 |
| 1935 | 9 |
| 1936 | 5 |
| 1938 | 6 |
| 1940 | 5 |
| 1941 | 4 |
| 1942 | 5 |
| 1947 | 3 |
| 1948 | 3 |
| 1949 | 3 |
| 1950 | 3 |
| 1957 | 3 |
| 1959 | 3 |
| 1971 | 3 |
Where it’s loved
Most popular in these states
Samul isn’t concentrated in any one state. Either it’s spread evenly, or no state reaches the 25 births over three years needed before a rate means anything.
More like it
More like Samul
The numbers
Every figure
- Births in 1971
- 5
- Rank in 1971
- #4,907
- How rare
- 1 in 353,689 boys
- Since 1882
- 226
Samul was last recorded in 1971. Fewer than five boys have been given the name in any year since, which is the point below which the record stops reporting.
Most popular in 1882, at 44 per million boys born.
There isn’t enough data for a ten-year trend: Samul doesn’t appear in both ends of that window.
Figures from the US Social Security Administration’s 2025 release. How these numbers are made.