Elberta · Shortlist Together

Meaning

We don’t have a verified meaning for Elberta.

We only publish meanings we can cite to a source you could check yourself. Most sites will give you one anyway; the ones you find elsewhere are often copied between sites without verification.

Its story

Popularity since 1883

Hover over or drag across the chart to see any year.

Per million girls born. Years with fewer than five births are not in the record, so the line breaks rather than dropping to zero.

See the 76 recorded years as a table

Elberta, per million girls born. Years absent from the table had fewer than five births.
Year	Per million
1883	45
1889	34
1892	24
1894	27
1895	26
1896	21
1897	38
1898	39
1899	39
1900	70
1901	58
1902	57
1903	65
1904	73
1905	69
1906	61
1907	69
1908	45
1909	63
1910	58
1911	57
1912	59
1913	69
1914	56
1915	42
1916	58
1917	52
1918	48
1919	46
1920	48
1921	39
1922	37
1923	43
1924	34
1925	30
1926	34
1927	39
1928	39
1929	43
1930	25
1931	23
1932	28
1933	30
1934	29
1935	29
1936	23
1937	33
1938	13
1939	25
1940	19
1941	16
1942	16
1943	17
1944	19
1945	16
1946	10
1947	12
1948	7
1949	6
1950	8
1951	6
1952	8
1953	7
1954	6
1955	5
1956	3
1957	4
1958	2
1959	2
1960	5
1961	2
1962	4
1968	3
1971	5
1974	5
1979	4

Where it’s loved

Most popular in these states

Elberta isn’t concentrated in any one state. Either it’s spread evenly, or no state reaches the 25 births over three years needed before a rate means anything.

More like it

More like Elberta

The numbers

Every figure

Births in 1979: 6
Rank in 1979: #9,010
How rare: 1 in 267,544 girls
Since 1883: 1,750

Elberta was last recorded in 1979. Fewer than five girls have been given the name in any year since, which is the point below which the record stops reporting.

Most popular in 1904, at 73 per million girls born.

There isn’t enough data for a ten-year trend: Elberta doesn’t appear in both ends of that window.

Figures from the US Social Security Administration’s 2025 release. How these numbers are made.