Meaning
We don’t have a verified meaning for Lakecia.
We only publish meanings we can cite to a source you could check yourself. Most sites will give you one anyway; the ones you find elsewhere are often copied between sites without verification.
Its story
Popularity since 1965
Hover over or drag across the chart to see any year.
See the 33 recorded years as a table
| Year | Per million |
|---|---|
| 1965 | 3 |
| 1966 | 3 |
| 1967 | 4 |
| 1968 | 4 |
| 1970 | 5 |
| 1971 | 16 |
| 1972 | 16 |
| 1973 | 16 |
| 1974 | 17 |
| 1975 | 23 |
| 1976 | 20 |
| 1977 | 25 |
| 1978 | 23 |
| 1979 | 19 |
| 1980 | 21 |
| 1981 | 16 |
| 1982 | 25 |
| 1983 | 20 |
| 1984 | 19 |
| 1985 | 16 |
| 1986 | 7 |
| 1987 | 10 |
| 1988 | 10 |
| 1989 | 10 |
| 1990 | 10 |
| 1991 | 4 |
| 1992 | 4 |
| 1993 | 4 |
| 1994 | 3 |
| 1995 | 4 |
| 1996 | 3 |
| 2001 | 3 |
| 2003 | 3 |
Where it’s loved
Most popular in these states
Lakecia isn’t concentrated in any one state. Either it’s spread evenly, or no state reaches the 25 births over three years needed before a rate means anything.
More like it
More like Lakecia
The numbers
Every figure
- Births in 2003
- 5
- Rank in 2003
- #15,784
- How rare
- 1 in 365,429 girls
- Since 1965
- 629
Lakecia was last recorded in 2003. Fewer than five girls have been given the name in any year since, which is the point below which the record stops reporting.
Most popular in 1977, at 25 per million girls born.
There isn’t enough data for a ten-year trend: Lakecia doesn’t appear in both ends of that window.
Figures from the US Social Security Administration’s 2025 release. How these numbers are made.